On the (Im-)Possibility of Extending Coin Toss
نویسندگان
چکیده
Dennis Hofheinz1, Jörn Müller-Quade2, and Dominique Unruh2 1 CWI, Cryptology and Information Se urity Group, Prof. Dr. R. Cramer, D n i . o h i z i n e n s H f e n w . l 2 IAKS, Arbeitsgruppe Systemsi herheit, Prof. Dr. Th. Beth, Universität Karlsruhe, { u l e q u r h r . k . e m e l r , n u } i a u a d Abstra t. We onsider the ryptographi two-party proto ol task of extending a given oin toss. The goal is to generate n ommon random oins from a single use of an ideal fun tionality whi h gives m < n ommon random oins to the parties. In the framework of Universal Composability we show the impossibility of se urely extending a oin toss for statisti al and perfe t se urity. On the other hand, for omputational se urity the existen e of a proto ol for oin toss extension depends on the number m of random oins whi h an be obtained for free . For the ase of stand-alone se urity, i.e., a simulation based se urity de nition without an environment, we present a novel proto ol for un onditionally se ure oin toss extension. The new proto ol works for superlogarithmi m, whi h is optimal as we show the impossibility of statisti ally se ure oin toss extension for smaller m. Combining our results with already known results, we obtain a (nearly) omplete hara terization under whi h ir umstan es oin toss extension is possible.
منابع مشابه
People toss coins with more vigor when the stakes are higher
We trust that the uncertainty regarding the outcome of a coin toss makes it a fair procedure for making a decision. Small differences in the force used to toss a coin should not affect this uncertainty. However, the voluntary movement involved in tossing a coin is subject to motivational influences arising from the anticipation of the value of the outcome of the toss. Presented here are measure...
متن کاملA Full Characterization of Functions that Imply Fair Coin Tossing and Ramifications to Fairness
It is well known that it is impossible for two parties to toss a coin fairly (Cleve, STOC 1986). This result implies that it is impossible to securely compute with fairness any function that can be used to toss a fair coin. In this paper, we focus on the class of deterministic Boolean functions with finite domain, and we ask for which functions in this class is it possible to information-theore...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Heads or Tails: the Impact of a Coin Toss on Major Life Decisions and Subsequent Happiness
Little is known about whether people make good choices when facing important decisions. This paper reports on a large-scale randomized field experiment in which research subjects having difficulty making a decision flipped a coin to help determine their choice. For important decisions (e.g. quitting a job or ending a relationship), those who make a change (regardless of the outcome of the coin ...
متن کاملNote on fair coin toss via Bitcoin
In this short note we show that the Bitcoin network can allow remote parties to gamble with their bitcoins by tossing a fair or biased coin, with no need for a trusted party, and without the possibility of extortion by dishonest parties who try to abort. The superfluousness of having a trusted party implies that there is no house edge, as is the case with centralized services that are supposed ...
متن کاملElecting a Leader
The following scenario was examined in [1]: we toss ideal coins, then toss those which show tails after the first toss, then toss those which show tails after the second toss, etc. Observe that if, at a given toss, only heads appear, then the process immediately terminates. Suppose instead that we require the coins (all of which showed heads) to be tossed again? Under such a change of rules, ...
متن کامل